S–01 Solutions · By stage
Design a study that survives review.
From research question to reviewer-ready protocol, with the statistics thought through before a single data point is collected.
What this solves
Most studies don't fail at analysis — they fail at design, quietly, months earlier. A missing comparator, an endpoint nobody defined, a sample size that was a guess. Reviewers find these things because reviewers always do.
How it works
You answer the questions a reviewer would ask, and the workspace assembles the protocol around your answers — every choice recorded, every revision versioned.
- Living protocol & SAP templates for cohort, case-control, and interventional designs
- PICO framing with explicit endpoint definitions
- Power & sample-size engines, validated against textbook values
- Version history a reviewer can actually follow
What you leave with
A protocol that anticipates review instead of reacting to it — and a design record your whole team can cite, defend, and reuse in the next study.
Your next study could move like this.